Borderless Betting in Myanmar

Author: Shinn Thant (Eric) Aung

Advisor: Pobsook Chamchong

 

Introduction

Myanmar has faced profound political, economic, and social upheaval since the military coup in February 2021. The removal of the democratically elected government triggered widespread protests, violent crackdowns, and a collapse in governance. Public institutions have weakened or become militarized, economic instability has intensified, and millions have been displaced or driven into informal livelihoods. In this context of state fragility, unregulated digital activity has rapidly expanded, particularly in sectors such as cryptocurrency, informal finance, and online entertainment.

Among these trends, the rise of offshore online gambling has emerged as a serious but under-addressed crisis. While traditional gambling in Myanmar was already loosely regulated, the explosion of borderless, app-based betting which is facilitated by smartphones, social media, and cryptocurrency has created new policy challenges. This issue is not only financial or moral; it intersects with youth vulnerability, organized crime, and digital governance. As enforcement lags and corruption persists, online gambling has taken root as both a symptom and accelerator of broader societal breakdown.

Problem Statement

Since the 2021 military coup in Myanmar, a new socio-economic threat has quietly emerged: the exponential rise of online gambling, particularly through offshore betting platforms. These platforms, operating outside of national jurisdictions, have emerged in the vacuum left by weakened governance and public institutions. Myanmar’s fragile financial environment, combined with high youth unemployment, the spread of smartphones, and access to cryptocurrency, has created a perfect storm for unregulated online gambling to thrive.

Recent data from Start.io (2023) reveals that an estimated 1.68 million individuals in Myanmar are active gamblers which is approximately 3.1% of the national population, a number that is likely underreported and increasing. Among them, 85.7% are male, with over 88% aged between 18–34 years, indicating a generational crisis deeply tied to economic desperation and poor digital literacy.

These platforms are not only draining the personal finances of already-vulnerable populations. They are causing widespread debt, mental health issues, and familial breakdowns. Moreover, they also contribute to organized crime, human trafficking, and scam centers, particularly in border zones like Myawaddy. In some instances, victims are lured by false job offers and forced to work in scam compounds tied to illegal gambling operations (UNODC, 2022). The transnational nature of these platforms renders Myanmar’s regulatory tools largely ineffective. Unlike traditional gambling, which might be limited to local betting shops, offshore platforms are embedded in global payment systems, use cryptocurrency, and leverage aggressive, AI-driven ad targeting on social media platforms like Facebook and Telegram. All of which are difficult to trace and regulate. Additionally, corruption within enforcement bodies, lack of financial literacy, and the normalization of gambling as a quick-fix economic solution have compounded the crisis. In this environment, banning gambling websites is a temporary and ineffective solution. What’s needed is a deeper understanding of root causes and multi-layered policy intervention at national and regional levels.

Policy Analysis: Myanmar’s Policy Landscape on Gambling: Gaps, Weaknesses, and Risks

Myanmar’s regulatory framework for gambling is outdated, fragmented, and unequipped to handle modern digital and cross-border gambling operations. At the heart of this weakness is the Gambling Law of 1986, originally designed to regulate in-person gambling activities such as lotteries, horse racing, and underground casinos. It criminalizes unauthorized gambling but does not account for online betting, cryptocurrencies, or transnational platforms.

Key Issues in the Legal Framework:

• No digital-specific provisions: The 1986 Gambling Law makes no mention of online gambling, internet platforms, mobile apps, or payment systems.
• Enforcement gaps: Law enforcement has little capacity to trace digital gambling activities. Furthermore, local police forces are often underfunded, undertrained, or complicit due to bribes or political affiliations.
• Limited cross-border cooperation: Myanmar lacks bilateral or multilateral agreements to pursue offshore gambling platforms or extradite operators.
• Cryptocurrency loopholes: There is no formal regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges in Myanmar, allowing illegal operators to bypass banking systems and remain invisible to authorities.
• Post-coup paralysis: Since the 2021 military coup, legislative activity has stalled. The military junta focuses on political repression rather than digital regulation, allowing gambling platforms to expand unchecked.

While isolated arrests of gamblers or gambling operators are occasionally reported, these are reactive crackdowns rather than evidence of a functioning regulatory regime. The lack of public consultation, parliamentary debate, or institutional reform further weakens the state’s response capacity.

Conceptual Framework: The Iceberg Model

The iceberg model is a systems-thinking tool that helps policymakers and researchers uncover the deeper, often hidden drivers behind a surface-level problem. In Myanmar’s case, while online gambling appears as a sudden and visible phenomenon, the roots lie in longstanding structural and belief-based factors that require attention.

Events (Surface Level):

At the tip of the iceberg are the observable signs of Myanmar’s gambling crisis:

• A rapid rise in online gambling apps and websites
• Increased youth participation in betting activities
• Spike in debt-related crimes and suicides
• A surge in cryptocurrency usage for gambling
• Mental health issues, social alienation, and family breakdowns

Patterns (Recurring Issues):

Beneath the surface are recurring patterns that reinforce these outcomes:

• Persistent and aggressive gambling ads on social media (especially targeting low-income young males)
• Law enforcement paralysis, often worsened by corruption and resource limitations
• Platform migration: operators frequently shift domains or servers to avoid being banned, rendering digital bans ineffective
• Widespread misinformation, including fake success stories that normalize gambling as a financial solution

Structures (Root Causes):

At the structural level, several systemic enablers exist:

• Low financial literacy across much of the population
• Lack of digital governance capacity, including monitoring tools for financial flows
• Absence of consumer protection and data privacy laws
• Weak regional coordination, especially within ASEAN, to monitor and regulate offshore financial crimes

Beliefs (Mental Models and Metaphors)

At the deepest level, online gambling is sustained by internalized metaphors and beliefs. Many people see gambling as: “A way out of poverty” or “the only hope to change my fate.”

Analytical Framework: The Foresight Triangle

The foresight triangle helps frame Myanmar’s online gambling crisis by evaluating how the past, present, and future shape its trajectory and policy options.

Push of the Present:

The current environment in Myanmar encourages the growth of borderless gambling:

• Widespread smartphone penetration and digital payment systems (e.g., KBZPay, Wave Money)
• Political and economic collapse driving informal income-seeking behavior
• Cryptocurrency adoption enabling untraceable, cross-border transactions
• Social media as a de facto digital marketplace for gambling ads, influencers, and peer networks

Weight of the Past:

Myanmar’s history of gambling, especially in informal or “black market” settings have laid the foundation:

• Gambling has long been tolerated informally and even perceived as part of local culture
• Past regulatory efforts were poorly enforced due to corruption and lack of public trust
• Institutional failure to provide formal entertainment, economic opportunities, or social protections
• Legacy of weak regional cyber-crime cooperation, making enforcement impossible beyond borders

Pull of the Future:

Several questions define the uncertainty of Myanmar’s future:

• Will ASEAN collaborate on cross-border gambling frameworks and enforcement tools?
• Will blockchain innovation outpace governments’ ability to trace illicit financial flows?
• Can Myanmar or its allies develop regTech (regulatory technologies) to combat offshore financial networks?
• Will regional tech companies (including fintechs and telcos) accept greater responsibility?

Comparative Case Studies: Lessons from Other Countries

Cambodia (Prohibition without Enforcement Capacity)

In 2019, Cambodia banned online gambling licenses due to rising concerns over money laundering and criminal networks. However, instead of stopping these activities, the operations went underground — worsening corruption and shifting criminal operations toward scam compounds along the Thai-Myanmar border (UNODC, 2022). This reveals that banning without strong enforcement only drives the problem out of sight, not out of existence.

China (Aggressive Crackdown with Cross-Border Cooperation)

China has pursued a robust crackdown on cross-border online gambling since 2020, including arrests, extraditions, and international agreements with ASEAN states. It also criminalized the promotion of overseas gambling services. However, China’s model works due to centralized control, advanced surveillance, and strong bilateral enforcement treaties — features Myanmar currently lacks but could aspire to develop in cooperation with allies.

United Kingdom (Regulated Market with Consumer Protection)

The UK has one of the most mature gambling regulatory systems. It balances legal access to gambling with strict safeguards, including affordability checks, age verification, advertising limitations, and recently, a proposal for a monthly loss cap on online slot machines (Gambling Commission, 2023). The UK’s experience shows that legalization with robust regulation and monitoring can reduce harm, but even advanced systems must evolve with technology and user behavior.

Sweden (Legalization with Strong Licensing)

Sweden reformed its gambling laws in 2019 to allow foreign gambling companies to apply for licenses. This helped channel gambling into a regulated system, improve tax revenue, and promote safer gambling practices. The Swedish Gambling Authority plays a key role in compliance, consumer safety, and data-driven enforcement.

Policy Recommendations:

Addressing Myanmar’s growing online gambling crisis requires a multi-level strategy. The response must extend beyond superficial bans and target the systemic drivers of gambling behavior — economic vulnerability, digital access, social normalization, and transnational loopholes. The following recommendations offer a comprehensive approach grounded in the analysis above:

1. Launch Nationwide Financial Literacy and Digital Risk Campaigns
   1. Target Group: Youths aged 18–34, especially in urban and peri-urban areas
   2. Content: Focus on online scams, gambling risks, financial planning, and digital hygiene
   3. Medium: Local languages via social media, influencers, radio, and school/university programs
   4. Partners: Civil society, fintech firms, education institutions, and diaspora communities

Rationale: Increasing financial literacy and digital awareness can reduce vulnerability to gambling advertisements and manipulation. Public education is a cost-effective preventive strategy.

1. Build National Regulatory Capacity to Monitor Digital Transactions
   1. Toolkits: Invest in regulatory technology (RegTech), including blockchain analysis and suspicious transaction alerts
   2. Institutions: Strengthen the Anti-Money Laundering Unit and Central Bank capacities
   3. Coordination: Establish a joint task force between financial regulators and cybersecurity teams

Rationale: Cryptocurrency and e-wallets have enabled the rise of untraceable offshore betting. Stronger technological tools can help monitor these flows and enforce gambling laws.

1. Develop a Transnational Framework through ASEAN
   1. Push for the inclusion of online gambling in the ASEAN Digital Crime Cooperation Framework
   2. Initiate bilateral agreements with Thailand, Cambodia, and the Philippines to regulate online gambling flows
   3. Establish a regional blacklist of domains, operators, and payment gateways involved in illegal gambling

Rationale: Online gambling is inherently borderless. Regional cooperation is crucial to tackle shared digital crimes and close jurisdictional gaps.

1. Engage Social Media Platforms and Payment Providers
   1. Policy Ask: Require digital platforms (Facebook, Telegram, TikTok) to monitor and remove gambling advertisements targeting Myanmar users
   2. Partnerships: Work with fintech firms (KBZPay, Wave Money, and Binance) to trace and freeze suspicious transfers

Rationale: Gambling platforms rely heavily on targeted advertising and fast financial infrastructure. Holding platforms and payment intermediaries accountable can reduce access and exposure.

1. Establish a National Gambling Harm Prevention Strategy
   1. Structure: Create a national advisory council including government agencies, NGOs, digital policy experts, and youth representatives
   2. Programs: Support recovery services for addiction, hotline services, and counseling for debt-related mental health issues
   3. Data: Fund research to track gambling trends and user behaviors

Rationale: Harm reduction must accompany regulatory efforts. A central strategy will help Myanmar shift from reaction to prevention and accountability.

1. Protect People Trapped in Scam Centers
   1. Action: Collaborate with humanitarian organizations and international law enforcement to rescue individuals trafficked into scam and gambling compounds
   2. Legal Reform: Update Myanmar’s anti-human trafficking law to reflect new digital and labor exploitation realities

Rationale: Scam centers are a hidden, yet growing arm of the gambling ecosystem. Humanitarian and security efforts must address this directly.

Conclusion

Myanmar’s gambling crisis is not only a story of addiction — it is a story of structural neglect, digital vulnerability, and regional inaction. Tackling it requires bold, smart, and collaborative governance; the kind that understands systems, anticipates futures, and protects the most vulnerable.

By reframing gambling not as a vice to suppress but as a systemic digital risk, Myanmar has the chance to lead the region in formulating a 21st-century regulatory approach; one grounded in protection, cooperation, and resilience.

References

1. ASEAN. (2022). ASEAN Digital Integration Framework Action Plan (DIFAP) 2021–2025. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Adopted-ASEAN-Digital-Integration-Framework.pdf
2. BBC News. (2023, April 12). Inside Myanmar’s scam compounds and human trafficking networks.https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c2d3w90x86po
3. Gambling Commission. (2023). Strengthening protections in the online gambling space.https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/news/article/new-rules-boosting-safety-and-consumer-choice
4. Hsiao, R. (2021). China’s campaign against overseas gambling: The strategy behind the crackdown. Jamestown Foundation. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3128949/chinas-crackdown-cross-border-gambling-aims-payment-platforms
5. International Crisis Group. (2022). Myanmar’s Military Struggles to Control the Virtual Battlefield.https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/myanmar/314-myanmars-military-struggles-control-virtual-battlefield
6. Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business (MCRB). (2021). Briefing Paper: ICT and Content Regulation in Myanmar.https://www.myanmar-responsiblebusiness.org/
7. Open Development Myanmar. (2020). Gambling Law (1986). https://www.google.com/search?q=Open+Development+Myanmar.+(2020).+Gambling+Law+(1986).&oq=Open+Development+Myanmar.+(2020).+Gambling+Law+(1986).&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBggAEEUYOzIGCAAQRRg7MgYIARBFGEAyBwgCEAAY7wUyCggDEAAYgAQYogQyCggEEAAYgAQYogQyCggFEAAYgAQYogQyCggGEAAYgAQYogTSAQcyNDBqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
8. Start.io. (2023). Myanmar Gambling Users Profile. https://www.start.io/audience/betting-and-gambling-enthusiasts-in-myanmar
9. Swedish Gambling Authority. (2019). Swedish Gambling Act Implementation. https://www.stockholm-network.org/swedens-approach-to-online-gambling-in-a-european-context.html#:~:text=Established%20in%202019%20and%20currently,the%20Swedish%20Gambling%20Authority%2C%20Spelinspektionen.
10. Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index: Myanmar.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_in_Myanmar#:~:text=When%20ranked%20by%20score%2C%20Myanmar,lowest%20score%20was%20Myanmar’s%2C%2016.
11. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2022). Transnational Organized Crime in Southeast Asia: Evolution, Growth and Impact https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/archive/documents/Publications/2019/SEA_TOCTA_2019_web.pdf
12. UNICEF Myanmar. (2023). Digital safety for Myanmar youth. https://www.unicef.org/media/152176/file/Myanmar-2023-COAR.pdf
13. World Bank. (2022). Myanmar Economic Monitor: Coping with crisis. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/myanmar/publication/myanmar-economic-monitor-reports